Dispute resolution

Always consider whether the claim is fully or partially legitimate. Fighting a legitimate claim can be expensive.

Always respond to claims you disagree with. Failure to respond gives the other party the opportunity to come forward with unjustified claims, and may incur costs such as debt collection fees and the like.

Lack of ability to pay does not relieve the obligation to pay. Instead, try to get an agreement on reduced or deferred payment.

Always meet deadlines. In many cases, deadlines are absolute.

Debt collection may work, but a debt collector must also present the claim to the bailiff or the court if the debtor does not pay voluntarily.

The choice of procedure often means a lot for the result, the costs and the time it takes to achieve coverage. It makes a big difference whether the problem is a legal dispute, refusal to pay or inability to pay.

Investigate the customer's ability to pay before legal proceedings are initiated.

There is usually full access to appearing before Norwegian courts and the bailiff authorities without a lawyer, but it is not certain that it is wise.

There is always a risk of losing a case, and of being liable for the other party's legal costs. One of the lawyer's most important tasks is to assess this risk.

Settling a dispute mean saved expenses and saved time. Consider whether the difference between a settlement and a full victory is worth the price, time and uncertainty.

Do not wait too long to contact a lawyer. Unfortunate statements and tactical choices can make it more difficult to achieve what you are entitled to.

Both individuals and companies can have cover for legal expenses through insurance. Many insurance contracts contain a legal aid cover. Feel free to ask the lawyer about the possibilities.

The different dispute acts and common law regarding disputes are diverse and demanding. In a dispute before the courts, it is just as important to master the legal procedure as being experienced in the specific subject area in question.